Hearing about the repression of the Chinese memory is deeply saddening. The Chinese government's refusal to acknowledge the events on June 3 and 4 at Tiananmen Square is appaling. It is unthinkable to contemplate this kind of repression of memory. The masacre of students in Beijing and Chungdu reminds me of the masacre of Tlatelolco in Mexico City. The government turned against its own people, student protesters. The events were denied, repressed. However, in 2000, records were opened. There is a memorial in Mexico city, memorializing the students who died in 1968. China needs to acknowledge these events, and give the grieving closure and the "truth, compensation, accountability" they have been pleading for.
Today's talk and documentary was eye opening. It was such a privilege to hear from Mike Chinoy and get the perspective of a journalist who was there to witness the events leading up to Tiananmen Square and how the event was reported.
A quote from the camera woman Cynde stuck with me: Journalists are there to witness history. They are there to report, to share with the world what is happening. Despite the danger she and other journalists experienced, they risked their safety to be able to accurately report the news to the world. This concept is incredibly important to communicate to my students.
The other issue of repression of journalists is incredible. The story told in the documentary of China's government official
The journalists were told that they would cut off satellite feed. CNN hooked up camera in their room and government officials came and instructed them to stop. Hearing the frustration of being censored was a powerful story and would be effective in showing students how journalists were suppressed.
Another idea that really struck me was: Standing in front of the tank: man is a mystery. His picture is iconic and gives us a powerful image of the protests and later the massacre of 1989.
There is no doubt of the enormous contribution media has played in support of the June 4 Incident in Beijing! The world was able to view the protests erupt and follow it until its end because of media. What is shocking is that it appeared there was much footage available and the Chinese government did not shut down media sooner! Perhaps there was no one in government that managed international publicity. Thanks to Mike Chinoy for sharing his experiences through his documentary and Q&A.
I am also very thankful for Louisa Lim's lecture. I was completely unaware of student protests that occurred outside of Beijing in 1989 until Lim shared her research! It is not surprising that Chinese are reluctant to talk about these incidents, for negative issues like death and issues that would cause embarassment or loss of face are often suppressed. I am surprised, however, that her inspirational source for the search for information about the Chengdu protests, the mother who suffered the death of her son in the cause, would not share more information about others who had also lost family. Perhaps it is too difficult to talk about and it is best to suppress these negative memories.
Who knows what other stories and historical events have been suppressed by the government...
I thought the documentary Mike Chinoy wrote and directed was so interesting. Many of us who have seen the photo of “tank man” have probably asked who the man in front of the tank was and is. I have to admit I have never asked the question, after seeing many times both the video and the photo, who are the men behind the cameras. It was such an incredible look at the difficulties and successes with getting that footage out of China. I never really thought about how difficult it would be just to get that film out of the country. I think that the event being in 1989 and the lack of cell phones, the internet, and recording devices is something that my students never really consider because they have never lived without it. I never even thought prior to watching this documentary about how difficult it was for news reporters to get information out there to the world. Even the mention of getting a satellite feed and having to hide film in their underwear. I think the best part of the documentary was the section around minute 1:15 playing through the end of the video, where the photographer from Associated Press takes the photo and what he has to do to preserve that film just to get it to the ne[font=Arial]ws desk. That will definitely be the part I show to my class.[/font]
Getting to view the documentary with Mike Chinoy present was remarkable. After majoring in history and teaching World History for 8 years, I really thought I knew the full story of Tiananmen. However, this week's presentation showed me just how much of the story I was missing. I had little knowledge of the weeks leading up to the night of June 4, and I was totally unaware of the Gorbachev visit that led to the accumulation of media in Beijing. Similarly, I was fascinated with Mike's stories of the early age of live feed television and media coverage of the event. Overall, I plan on using excerpts, especially the footage of the student protests and the infamous "Tank Man", from the documentary with my World History class.
Other networks also had their feeds cut. Here are articles mentioning it:
On Rather getting pulled:
http://eightiesclub.tripod.com/id122.htm
In 2006, Rather showed footage of getting pulled. One of the people in the CBS space, not mentioned, but there, was the wife of the US ambassador, Bette Bao Lord: http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/rather-on-tiananmen/
On CBS, CNN, and NBC
http://www.nytimes.com/1989/05/25/world/china-again-cuts-off-tv-news-transmission.html
http://articles.latimes.com/1989-05-25/news/mn-720_1_john-sheahan-beijing-nbc-anchor-tom-brokaw
Chicago Tribune on CNN: http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1989-05-20/news/8902020756_1_cnn-beijing-hotel-chinese
Here is an article about the pixalator that allow phone transmission of video:
http://articles.latimes.com/1989-06-07/entertainment/ca-1790_1_beijing-footage-phone-lines
Watching Mike Chinoy’s documentary series ”Assignment: China” only confirms the power of the students. Much like the young people who structured a hierarchy in Tianamen to deliver their dissent from the Chinese government, I am reminded again of the impact our students can have in making history. They, like those college students, are fervent, and quite often, tenacious.
The apathy my students express causes me to be dismissive of their wants, their views, and sometimes their beliefs. Yet, if I hold onto this cynical view, why then am I in the classroom? Chinoy’s work serves not only to show how collaborative efforts must be in delivering news,, but also to highlight the power of students – common, everyday idealist whose views must be recognized.
Time and time again, students have been at the forefront in reform protest and they are able to garner public support as these students are not strangers but sons, daughters – individuals whose proximity strikes us and whose youth cause introspective reflection of ourselves. The students, then and now, continue to shape the narrative of our history.
edited by crhude on 12/16/2015
After watching the documentary and listening to Mike Chinoy’s experience, as well as the thought process of Professor Lim in writing her book, I have a new perspective in the process of journalism. I had never considered the intensive decision making and sacrifices that journalist must make for a story. I also thought it was fascinating that one of the journalists admitted to having dinner with one of the leaders of the hunger strikes during the strike! The politics around telling a story is incredibly interesting. I wonder what is the cost of the “truth”, in the production process of the story? This is something I would like to explore with my students.
Session 10 and 11 have been such a thrill to be a part of. It was a great start to have an introduction of the film by a journalist who lived the documentary, Mike Chinoy. His and the experiences of the others who were there filming the events are invaluable. I was so excited to learn more about the events at Tienanmen and I love how the documentary is covering two stories. One story is the story of Tienanmen itself which I knew so little about. The other story is the story of the reporters and how their work was cut in China. Truly a fascinating series that I would love to watch all of! This is also a great resource for our students to see how history is recorded and how the facts can be changed. The way China has chosen to deal with the events in T-Square is so beyond what anyone from this country would expect in a government. I think many of our students would love to see stories like this about governments that are so starkly different from what they have grown up around.
I know there is someone in our class that teaches Spanish. Comparing T-square to anything former Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez has done may be an interesting lesson in corruption.
Prior to this session, I did not know much about Tiananmen Square and political impact of it. I truly appreciated watching the introduction to the documentary, in that it provided me with an eye opening experience into the events of Tiananmen. I will definitely be watching the rest of this series in the next few weeks, as a way to educate myself and have a better knowledge base for my students. I could definitely see myself using clips from this documentary to intro aspects of modern day China into my lessons, either as a hook or APK to get students engaged in the topic of Tiananmen Square. Also, as Kritzian mentioned previously, I never really explored the idea of what journalists deal with when reporting events, so it was great to hear the perspectives of both Mike Chinoy and Louisa Lim and how they have worked to cover the events of Tianamen Square.
Thank you Professor Dube for posting the different articles on how news transmission was impacted during the Tiananmen Square protests. It was interesting to see how the government forced the tv transmissions to get off the air, and the drama CNN and other outlets went through in order to try and get and the news reported. Again, I am shocked with the amount of censorship China has/had on their people and the information they distribute, and would be interested to learn more about how current Chinese society feels about the censorship today. Is this concerning, normal, or worrisome for them? Do they care or not? And if so, could there be protests similar to those at Tiananmen Square in the future? Or would this be taboo?
Both speakers covered so much fascinating material today and my knowledge in Tiananmen Square was expanded tremendously. First and foremost, I found the Assignment China episode to be very thought provoking and very useful for my unit on the Cold War. I tend to be very skeptical about the representation of current events on various media outlets because I always think various news outlets have their own bias. However, listening to the experiences of these journalist reporting on the event really help to humanize them. In my Cold War unit, I also touch upon the roles of mothers as activists within the context of Latin America. I was very excited to learn that Louisa Lim did some work on a mother who lost her son in the Chengdu protest. This is a fantastic case study that I see myself incorporating into my class to highlight the universality of the fight for human rights and memory.
edited by nramon on 1/10/2016
Re: The Use of Tienanmen Square in the classroom
Jennifer I know you teach 6th grade which is a far reach from modern Chinese history, but I wonder how you can use all these resources to teach the difference between primary and secondary sources. I can see myself using these resources within my Cold War unit but I would use these resources were not within the scope and sequence of my content area, I would use them to teach about sources inspired by firsthand accounts and secondary sources. I think these also provide a great opportunity to teach about bias and motive. I thought the piece by Che Muqi provides a good counter perspective to many resources regarding the student protesters at Tiananmen Square.
edited by nramon on 1/12/2016
Re: Decision Making Process for Journalists
Kriztian, I must also admit that I have a newfound appreciation for journalists after watching the documentary on the experiences of journalists in Tiananmen Square. I often forget that they are in the trenches with the people and that they, just like teachers have empathy for the people they interact with. Hearing about the corporation that own and control the media has made me somewhat jaded and skeptical for the way networks report on happenings, but seeing this documentary reminded me of the human aspect of journalistic work. I think it is worthwhile to allow students to question how news is reported and think about any corporate agendas behind that, but it is also important to remind students that journalists are humans too.
edited by nramon on 1/12/2016
It is impressive the power that students have when united for a cause. In many countries university students protest against their governments like the Students in Tiananmen Square, China and end up very badly. Most times the students are subdued by the government with force, violence and some are killed. In Mexico there are students that went missing and today no one really knows what exactly happen to them. It is sad that we still see injustices in this world. Tiananmen Square left a legacy for the newer generations in China. Chinese way of life seems to have become easier and better now than it was before the Tiananmen Square incident. Let us not forget the students that gave their lives for what they believed was right.