Retro-historians like to condemn the US for dropping the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In Human terms every death is a tragedy but in terms of the war it was a logical step. Imperial Japan launched a brutal war of aggression against all nations in the Asian-Pacific region that did not submit to their superiority. Read the somwhat receint book on the Rape of Nanking, it shows the arrogance and inhumanity of the Japanese military government, there are a great many examples in both book and movie form that you could examine that have basicly the same point. It was NOT an isolated incident. And it is still an issue of conflict between the Japanese and several nations including China and Korea.
As for the bombs, we faced an enemy that showed no sign of surrender. Defenders of the Islands we battled on on the road to Japan fought to the death typically. We anticipated 700,000 to 1.5 million US casualitys for the projected invasion of the Japanese mainland and several times that for the Japanese. The context of war must be taken into account as well; War is not a game, you destroy the enemy as they try to destroy you.
We killed far fewer with thost atomic bombs than would have died in the invasion or in the continued conventional bombing raids. We had just launched a massive raid on Tokyo that caused fire-storms that killed far more that our 2 atom bombs.
One other thing, By using the Atomic bob on cities we gave the world a chance to see what these things could do. It has made those countries that have them reluctant to use them. In 1962 the world found itself on the brink...RIGHT on the brink of a nuclear war between the US and the USSR... the visions of Hiroshima and Nagasaki stayed their hand and we used diplomacy to end the crisis. 300 million people owe their lives to the people of Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
As food for thought: President Franklin Roosvelt died in 1945 leaving an uninformed Truman with all the decisions. Would either of them have dropped the bombs if they had been at Alamogordo to watch the Trinity test? (the test explosion) or would they have agreed with many of the scientists and set off a demonstration blast first? We only had the 2 bombs so we would have been left with just one and what if it misfired? (By the way, radiation was little understood it was widely believed that it would not extend past the blast radius and so anyone who would be killed by the radiation would have been killed already)
Just some rambling thoughts.
Richard[Edit by="rcate on Nov 28, 10:04:05 AM"][/Edit]