The following will be useful to you in understanding and teaching about China 1900-1949. The most important resources we'll refer to in class. These include Japan's 21 Demands, Sun's plan, Mao's report, and Jiang's speech about national identity.
1894-95 Sino-Japanese War ends with the Treaty of Shimonoseki
http://china.usc.edu/treaty-shimonoseki-1895
Japan's Rise: Visualizing Cultures: Throwing Off Asia I (Japan "westernizes")
http://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/21f/21f.027/throwing_off_asia_01/index.html
Visualizing Cultures: Throwing Off Asia II (Sino-Japanese war)
http://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/21f/21f.027/throwing_off_asia_02/index.html
Taiwan as a Japanese colony
postcards: http://digital.lafayette.edu/collections/eastasia/lewis-postcards/browse
photos/postcards: http://digital.lafayette.edu/collections/eastasia/warner-postcards/browse
1899 - The US worries about the carving up of China
John Hay's Open Door Notes: http://china.usc.edu/first-open-door-note-1899
1915 - Japan issues 21 Demands
See japan-21-demands-1915.pdf attached.
Xu Zhengkeng, "Things about American and Americans" -- published in China in 1926, based on his studies and travels in the U.S., 1918-21
See xu-zhengkeng-1918-21-things-about-america.pdf attached.
Mao Zedong, "The Peasant Movement in Hunan" -- Mao was a native of Hunan and reported on conditions there, making his case for the readiness of rural areas for revolution. At this point, Mao is maneuvering for influence in the Communist Party. He would secure the top position in 1935 and yield it only when he died in 1976. See mao-1927-hunan-peasant-movement.pdf attached.
Jiang Jieshi (Chiang Kai-shek), "The National Identity," consolidated control over the Guomindang (Kuomintang) 1925-27 and dominated it until his death in 1975. He was China's preeminent leader from 1927 until driven from the mainland in 1949. See Jiang-1939-45-national-identity.pdf attached.
Wang Jingwei (Wang Ching-wei) had been an associate of Sun Yat-sen's and served in Jiang's government. He broke away, however, and formed a new government under Japan's effective control. There are two sets of cartoons published at his capital in Nanjing attached.
Mao on Art and Literature (1942): https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-3/mswv3_08.htm
Jiang Jieshi (Chiang Kai-shek) victory speech audio with images, 1945: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpKai-UHQ7A
Mao on the departure of the US Ambassador to China, Leighton Stuart (1949): [url=] https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-4/mswv4_67.htm
Who lost China? -- here is a terrific article by Lloyd Eastman on Jiang's view. See Eastman-1981-who-lost-china.pdf which is attached.
The U.S. Government issued a massive "white paper" on China in August 1949. A short one page statement from the US Secretary of State Acheson is attached. See White-Paper-Excerpt.pdf.
Remembering - 2015.9.3 (Chinese date order), military parade celebrating the 70th anniversary of victory over Japan (3 hour English language coverage, sample it as you please) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCfdGzXPN_w
edited by cgao on 11/11/2016
Looking on a map, it is easy to see why this treaty was one that not only confirmed that Japan was as much an imperialist power as any of the western nations at that time were, but it also conveyed a number of strategic advantages on the Japanese. By controlling Port Arthur at the end of the Liaodong Peninsula, and Taiwan, Japan literally had the ability to control the entire region along China's east coast, to include the Yellow Sea, the East China Sea and the Sea of Japan. This gave them a tremendous advantage, particularly when one considers that they were in the process of building one of the most modern fleets in the world, and definitely the most modern in Asia.
This is especially important when one considers that their leading Naval Officer, Admiral Togo, had read Alfred T. Mahan's book, Influence of Sea Power Upon History. He understood that a strong naval presence was of vital importance to any nation, let alone one that, like Great Britain, was centered around an island. The treaty also set the stage for Japan's eventually annexation of the Korean Peninsula. To see how much of a strategic advantage this gave the Japanese, one simply has to draw a triangle between the northern tip of Taiwan, the southern tip of Korea and the southwestern tip of Japan. This would be the area they could easily have dominated with a strong fleet. Additionally, with Port Arthur as a forward naval base, they could also have dominated China's inland sea.
This potential threat was understood by the western powers. It explains why they intervened in the treaty and forced Japan to accept a cash settlement for the Liaodong Peninsula instead of granting them control of that region. The seizure of Port Arthur by the Russians two years later would prove to be a major influence on why Japan eventually went to war with them in 1904 and 1905.
The treaty also influenced U.S. political and strategic thinking. Following the Spanish-American War, President McKinley chose not to grant the Philippines independence. One reason for this was to provide America with a forward territory from which to carry on trade with China and the east. Another was that the president was worried that granting the Philippines independence would open them up to conquest by another imperial power. His primary concern here was Japan and the possible extension of control they'd have over the South China Sea that domination of the Philippines would allow.
Despite the relatively small size of the early Japanese navy, they had a tremendous advantage in that the eastern coast of China and points south were within easy sailing distance of Japan. Any western power who they desired to confront would, on the other hand, be facing the prospect of sending a fleet almost halfway around the world to counter any Japanese threat. This was proven true at the Battle of Tsushima when the Japanese navy was easily able to overpower the Russian Baltic fleet following its long and exhausting voyage of more than seven months. It can therefore be seen that the Treaty of Shimonoseki not only fueled the immediate territorial desires and goals of Japan, but set up a strategic situation that would potentially put them in a position of dominance in the East.
edited by jhayden on 11/8/2016
Of course the historical background was new and interesting in this session, but the thing that caught my eye (or more specifically--my ear) was the writings of the time period. Being an English teacher--I was intrigued by Hu Shih and the story shared by Professor Dube about Mr. More or Less. It attracted my attention because the main character in the story, Mr. Chabuduo, doesn't seem to take things seriously and seems to float through life. I have students that will come up to me to hand in work and ask if it is "good enough". When Professor Dube related this story I could hear my students asking that question (a pet peeve of mine--I want them to live life, not coast through it). So I asked Catherine if she could get a copy of the story for me, and she did. I want to use this in my classroom. Since my students already seem to have an affinity to Asian culture and literature--it will be easy to get them to buy in to this story. Even better--it comes with the characters and translation. I am excited to share this with my students.
While Lu Xun wrote "Diary of a Madman" as an ironic attack on traditional Chinese and a call for a new culture movement, I found the part in our reading interesting and familiar. Literature is often written from the perspective of a crazy person--with insights , human and political, being the theme the author wants to reveal. This reading reminded me of something by Edgar Allan Poe--since paranoia is a regular part of his literature. Specifically, the narrator of "Diary of a Madman" seems to be similar to the narrator of "The Cask of Amontillado". Both are paranoid and while Poe's Montresor focuses on Fortunado--Lu Xun's narrator focuses on Mr. Chao and the others in the town. It would be interesting to create a unit comparing and contrasting what techniques the authors use, characterization, and theme.
Unrelated to the story--but related to the time period: Looking at the politics of this time period (late 1800's-early 1900) I did appreciate that they tried to mobilize education and turn whatever they had into schools--even temples--so they could educate the people.
This story was so stressful. It helped me to really understand life from the perspective of someone living under the rule of the Kuomintang. Any time money was made, rather than it going to pay off debts or to be used in payroll to give a job to someone, it had to be given in bribes to the government officials. And then, when money wasn't enough, it was expected that if you wanted help against the kuomintang, you would have to give up your daughter to an illegitimate relationship. What a horrible life. No place or time to rest, ever. I was so relieved when Mrs. Lin took charge and engaged her daughter to Shousheng and she and her father ran away.
I think this would be a great story to share with older students to give them a personal understanding of the stress and tragedy that people have endured in the past, and most likely still endure in many places around the world today. That is the most important connection that young people can make. That the stories they read recounting the difficulties of people in the past, can also be happening right now. Research the conditions that people live in currently, regardless of the year, and discuss the reasons for these situations. Figure out whether anything can be done to make life better for struggling people around the world. Use the tools, intellect and resources we possess to help others. Empathy can be taught, and it's important to do so.
edited by elizabethr on 1/17/2017
I hear existential depression in Lu Xun's preface. He says he still holds hope, but he doesn't, really. He gave up, believing that the eventual outcome of his efforts would be in vain. Had he stuck with his original intention to learn real, healing medicine, and go back to China and endeavor to heal people and teach people that the profiteers who made money off of his father's illness were phonies, he could have actually done some good. It may have only been one person at a time, but over years, he would have been able to look back and see the result of his work.
This could be a good debate. Which Lu Xun do you think would have had the greater impact on individual people/families or Chinese society as a whole? Lu Xun the writer? Or Lu Xun the doctor? If you were Lu Xun, what would you have done and why? Does knowing the outcome of someone else's life choices make you more careful of your own life choices? Do your decisions now affect your future? Why or why not? Write a letter to Lu Xun. Persuade him to...........?
edited by elizabethr on 1/17/2017
I don't really know what to say about this. Lu Xun wrote about a man visiting another man, whose brother had previously been ill, but now he was better and he had left. The man who had been ill was mad, and believed that everyone wanted to murder him and eat him. Then he decided they wouldn't murder him, they would wait until he killed himself and then eat him. Perhaps my brain is tired, but all I can say about this story right now is that I've read it....
edited by elizabethr on 1/17/2017
“Who Lost China?” is an essay by Lloyd Eastman on Chiang Kai-shek’s post-mortem of the Nationalist defeat to the Chinese Communists. Chiang blamed most of the Guomindang’s defeat on a lack of leadership, organization and resolve. Although he never directly implicated the United States as contributing to the nationalist defeat, a narrative of “betrayal” developed within conservative circles in the U.S. and nationalist Taiwan. This denial of facts seems to be a common phenomenon amongst the defeated in history. Hitler rose to power by propagating the “stabbed in the back” myth blaming civilian “5th columnists” for Germany’s defeat in the First World War. Although the “betrayal thesis” has been debunked by careful research, it has persisted among the Taiwanese.
At the time I am writing this, a Google News headline involves the U.S. President-elect reversing 37 years of Chinese diplomacy by calling Taiwanese president, Tsai ing-wen. This move flies in the face of the “one China” paradigm that has been honored by the U.S. for almost four decades and is viewed as antagonistic by mainland China. Perhaps Mr. Trump has surrounded himself with advisors who feel it is in the interest of the country to stir up old disputes. Perhaps he believes in the “betrayal thesis” and wants to help restore who he and his supporters believe are China’s rightful rulers. It certainly seems unwise to antagonize such an important trade partner and purchaser of U.S. debt.
The China “White Paper” issued by the Truman administration was over 1000 pages long. It was meant to be a frank, transparent account of Sino-American relations with a focus on the Chinese Civil War. However, upon its release it created a furor on both sides of the Pacific. The paper was supposed to explain that the United States had done everything it could to help the Nationalist cause, but that poor leadership, corruption, and a lack of will to fight had allowed for Communist victory over the Kuomintang. However, the release of the paper in August 1949 was attacked by the “China lobby” in the United States as undermining the efforts of the Kuomintang. American conservative Alfred Kohlberg called the paper “the story of the American betrayal of the Republic of China.” In China, Mao Zedong used the White Paper for his own interests, “pointing out the illusions some Chinese still harbored about the United States, recounting the history and ultimate failure of American aggression against China, and dissecting the misperceptions, failures, and confusions plaguing American policy.” What had been an effort to exonerate American policy in China essentially backfired, giving fuel to an already overheated debate over the role of the United States in China.
I thought it was interesting to draw the comparison between the Nationalists and the Communists to present them as both wanting some of the same things. Often we think of them as completely different groups fighting for different things. I wonder if we could apply this to our own elections and politics as we are all fighting at the base level for the same things. I think the students could draw those connections and use them to look at people at their base level.
The treaty of Shimonoseki is a very important document between Japan and China. It was established in 1895 and consisted of 11 articles. I think this is a great piece to teach your students showing the reason for continued tension between the two countries today and treaties in general. In the 11 articles it clearly shows the dominance of Japan over China. I think that in itself would be surprising for students to realize. When most people look at the size of the countries and their proximity to each other you would assume China to be the more dominant force in history. Each article has definite advantages for Japan and robs China of some of their dignity. They needed to sign however to begin the healing and rebuilding that war requires.
The articles were signed by Count ITO Hirobumi and his staff in Japan and Emperor LI Hung-Chang and his staff of China. Article one states that Korea is to remain an independent country. Free to govern themselves. This never really happened in the real sense of independence, but the notion was nice.
Article 2 Had China ceding territories to Japan. There were three areas Japan wanted and so claimed those.
Article 3 set up a committee of both Chinese and Japanese to look at boundaries and redraw territories where necessary.
Article 4 Involved the monetary amount that China would pay Japan. It also set times for installments.
Article 5 Gave the Chinese people that were living in the Japanese controlled areas the right to sell and move if they did not want to be under Japanese rule.
Article 6 simply states that this treaty trumps all others treaties that may have been established in the past.
Article 7 concerns the Japanese military leaving China within three months.
Article 8 piggybacks off of Article 7 and states the military would not leave however until the first two payments had been made and other parts of the treaty were being followed.
Article 9 refers to the release and treatment of any prisoners of war on both sides.
Article 10 states that there are to be no more military missions or operations.
And finally article 11 simply ratifies and provides witness to the former 10 articles.
Japan got a great treaty, but China took a huge hit from this treaty and it still resonates in the telling of the history.
edited by cgao on 12/16/2016
According the saying a picture is worth a thousand words. So, thank you for the link to the Lafayette digital library.. Great images, poverty, and humbleness are well captured. I loved to see how they took measures to do the alterations on clothing.
Looking at the tooth removal, brought back some childhood memories, my mom used to tell me about her childhood stories and the way then children used to removed their teeth. I imagine it was similar to the way depicted in this picture. Nice way to illustrate the way things were in the good old days; hoping they appreciate dentists.
A satire about the American culture, certainly, he does prove his points. Superstitions, is a vignette in which he criticize those who believe in such a things. One thing that I never had thought about is if the time (hour) of birth is important in the Chinese culture? Why? For most of us the most important is the date in which we came to the world, no so much the hour in which we were born. I am curious of why Xu Zhengkeng in his writing referred to Vanderbilt, Gould and Rockefeller as his contemporaneous, when they weren’t. Is this a literary device? I see that, he does it to show the power that money has, I just wonder if in China money doesn’t talk. I thought that money moves the world around it. The vignette that I agree with is Train conversations. Certainly, Professors are the pillars of the nation. They are the source of all other professions, which is one the most important resources of a country.
I agree, I think giving students the opportunity to read and understand other life situations helps them learn empathy. I often use this in my world geo class as it fits easily, but I think using some of these writings I could use them in my psychology class. Students often see the world in black and white and seeing some of these hardships may help them understand mental stress. I can use these examples when we look at tough situations for the mind.
Xu Zhengkeng’s "Things about American and Americans" was a fun read. One of the first thing he does is lock on to American’s love of business and profit-making, of which he declares “Their whole civilization has its origin in this, and they are first among nations in their emphasis on money.” He goes on to describe how this feature of the American character has supplanted more traditional class distinctions of pedigree and rank. Instead of inquiring about a person’s name, place of origin, or occupation as is customary in China, Xu playfully writes that “Americans” wish only to know “how much have you?” Xu also speaks with accurately about the apparent impatience of many Americans, which he ties to their love of money. He lovingly describes the ingenious ways that Americans have created time and labor-saving contraptions which also turn a profit. Xu does get a little confusing though when he talks about superstitions among American bee-keepers and children’s holidays I am not aware of.