Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 45 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Session 11 - 11/18, Clay Dube #42689
    Angela Chong
    Spectator

    Reading this article I can absolutely understand why people are protesting, yet I don't know that it will make any difference in the end. First, this was going to happen eventually, and second there are some who aren't protesting and are just going about their daily lives. Seeing the picture of people heading to work amidst those who are protesting means that everyone isn't standing up. The world has not completely stopped, although I imagine it's difficult to keep things normal when areas are being taken over by the conflict. While I think I know how this will end, with China in complete control, I wonder how long they will allow the protests and unrest to continue. 

    in reply to: Session 11 - 11/18, Clay Dube #42688
    Angela Chong
    Spectator

    It's interesting that in Communist China it's referred to the "People's" when they don't have the power to really choose their leader or government. I know to a certain extent all people are subject to the decisions made by others, but the level of control the government has in China is significant and the propoganda to keep people in line is prevelent. When Clay shared that the head of China was critical of the United States electoral college, stating that the people don't vote directly in the United States like they do in China on the surface it would seem that was the case. While I personally do not agree with the electoral college, the process of choosing who is on the ballot is definitely different in China. The people's options for who they can vote for is not decided by the "people," and voting is a mear formality. 

    I was surprised to learn that such a small percentage of people are members of the "party." Recruitment begins early, in college, and those who are tapped have significant pressure to respond and fulfill their duties. For some reason I was under the impression everyone was a member, perhaps because it's called the "People's" Republic. 

    Due to the history of famines and political instability at times I would assume most Chinese people want to ensure they can provide for themselves and their families. They seem used to the heavy hand of the government, and either believe, or dutifully appear to believe the propoganda their government lays on them heavily. 

    Between this session and what my brother shared with me after his visit to China a few years ago I realized just how vast and diverse the country is. Even though general impressions of any country are not going to be accurate for every person living there, China is even more diverse. From the numerous local languages and different religous and cultural traditions a survey-type course is clearly not enough to develop a deep understanding of all there is to know of China. I'm looking forward to continuing with the upcoming course this Winter to learn more. 

    in reply to: Session 9 - 11/16 (morning) #42687
    Angela Chong
    Spectator

    I accidentally posted for this morning session on the afternoon forum. 

    Please see the afternoon session for my architecture posts. 

     

    Thank you. 

    in reply to: Final Essay #42686
    Angela Chong
    Spectator

    I have thoroughly enjoyed particiating in the East Asia since 1800 over these last few months. Everytime I drove home I'd share with someone how much I had learned and after each session I found my perspective altered once again. I appreciated being taught from the perspective of Asia, which helped further with the shift in perspective for me. One of the perspective shifts involved the two Koreas, and since I have typically always read or heard information through the United States filter I had a rose-colored-glasses view of South Korea. Evenwhen I taught World History and spent significant time doing research, I was always given the impression that North Korea was bad, and South Korea was good. Now having understood the political reasons the United States had to aligning with South Korea, and knowing the corruption that took place in South Korea I have a different perspective. While I was never one to take things at face value, this was something I didn't expect. It was a good reminder to consider the bigger picture. 

    Taking this seminar has already been infused into my classes, even before implementing the Curricumlum unit. First, it's been good to be a student again. I haven't taken any classes in a few years, and I like being reminded what it's like so I can relate to my students better. I have shared with them that I'm taking a class and some of the information I've learned. When discussing the Japanese Internment in the United States during World War 2 this last week, I gave background on why Japan was upset and attacked Pearl Harbor. Even the date of the attacks being different in Japan (Dec 8th), from the date we remember (Dec 7th) was surprising to my students. Something I wouldn't have even considered and had never been made aware of prior to taking this seminar. Again, part of this overall perspective shift I've had. 

    Each of the presenters offered a unique perspective and personal connection to the Asian country or region they were discussing. One example was when Clay shared about his in-laws condo having electricity all day, since it's across the street from a prison, is a vauable piece of information which helped me to understand better what life is like for the average person living in China. A people are shaped not only by their country's government and history, but also the challenges they face on a daily basis. I also apprecaited how open each presenter was to questions and many offered specific time for us to ask. 

    FInally, I have appreciated meeting regularly with fellow educators, to bounce off ideas and engage in conversation beyond the walls of our own schools. Meeting with teachers who teach a variety of subjects, grade levels, and work in different neighborhoods is refreshing. Having lunch and breaks to visit and reflect on what we heard gave it a chance to sink in. It's so important for us to have time as educators to hear from others and we don't get that opportunity very often. 

     

    in reply to: Session 11 - 11/18, Clay Dube #42658
    Angela Chong
    Spectator

    The dehumanzing government structures still seem to be more focused on production, than humanity. Like the quote you provided this is a carry over from the Mao era, where productivity was viewed as the highest value. Still, I would have assumed that China didn't have as many women working, simply because that seems to be related more to Westernized feminism. 

    I like the see-woinder-think chart comparing gender roles in different cultures. We discuss this in Ethnic Studies, comparing the home cultures of students in the class. I do a hand raising response to do a quick visual of who lives in a home with women doing ore cooking, men doing more cooking, etc. It's been interesting to see the variance in the classroom, and see students realize how they are similar to others and different. 

     

    in reply to: Session 5 - 10/21, Sam Yamashita #42557
    Angela Chong
    Spectator

    Matthew, I didn't think about the difference in calendars when Perry arrived in Japan. This was prior to the modernization of Japan, and I wonder if the Japanese went back and restated history in terms of the Western Calendar as part of the modernization when the Western Calendar was adopted? Or in History classes and articles, do they referrence the "old" time period? Here in the United States we refer to times in terms of Western Calendars, and then the changes of AD and BC. Our sense of time is through that lense, but how different would we view it if we understood the "old" way of time prior to modernization? Perhaps more discussion was had with regard to calendars in the prior session last sping, East Asia prior to 1800? I wasn't in that group. Were you?

    in reply to: Session 11 - 11/18, Clay Dube #42452
    Angela Chong
    Spectator

    Article: The Challenge of Reporting on Women in China, Where Men Control the Narrative

    Author:Ami Qin

    July 18th, 2019

    This is an article I will definitley use in my Ethnic Studies class. It highlights how women are treated in China, and how difficult it is to have anyone even speak up about it. In one case a woman had to sign an agreement with her employer that she would not get pregant for 2 years, despite the fact that she desperately wanted a child. In another case a woman wants to leave her husband, but she isn't even on the deed of the house. THe difficulty is that women don't speak out and when they do and there are protests the government silences it, even on social media. I think for students to fully understand this in the context of living in China I need to give some background on the difference in the government of China, and then here in the United States. I like using articles in class because they often explain things in a concise manner and makes it easier for students to understand the larger concepts. This will need some additional prior knowledge to fully understand though. I'm looking forward to our last session so I can first have a better handle on the currently culture of China. 

    The Challenge of Reporting on Women in China, Where Men Control the Narrative

    Workers during a lunch break in an office tower in Beijing, China. As the rest of the world seems to be making progress toward greater gender equality, however incremental, China has been backsliding.

    Workers during a lunch break in an office tower in Beijing, China. As the rest of the world seems to be making progress toward greater gender equality, however incremental, China has been backsliding.

    Gilles Sabrié for The New York Times

    By Amy Qin

    • July 18, 2019

    阅读简体中文版閱讀繁體中文版

    Times Insider explains who we are and what we do, and delivers behind-the-scenes insights into how our journalism comes together.

    There are dozens of them on display at the Museum of Shoes for Bound Feet, not far from the town in China where my mother grew up: colorful, intricately embroidered cloth shoes that fit perfectly in the palm of your hand.

    When I visited the museum in the southern Chinese province of Sichuan several years ago, I looked down at my big size 9 feet and felt a wave of gratitude that I had been spared the fate that had befallen my great-grandmother and generations of Chinese women before her. Because behind each pair of shoes was a lifetime of unimaginable pain, all in the name of shaping perfect little bound feet — or “golden lotuses” as they were often called.

    I thought back to that moment several months ago when I began reporting my recent article on how Chinese women have been losing ground. Living in Beijing, it is easy to see the progress that China has made in gender equality over the past century. Foot-binding has long been outlawed. Women in China are living longer than ever before. They excel in school, and now outnumber men at universities.

     

    And in a society that for centuries held that a woman’s place remained in the home, women now have a major presence in the work force — one of the few positive legacies of China’s repressive Mao era. While the number has been declining, 61 percent of working-age Chinese women participated in the labor force last year — higher still than many countries, including the United States (56 percent) and Germany (55 percent.)

    But in recent years, as the rest of the world seems to be making progress toward greater gender equality, however incremental, China has been backsliding.

    As China correspondent for The New York Times, I write about the intersection of politics, culture and society in China. Together with my colleague, Zoe Mou, we began reaching out to Chinese women to hear their stories. I took the bullet train from Beijing to Tianjin to meet with Bella Wang. Over coffee, and then spicy roast fish, Ms. Wang talked excitedly about her love of Marvel movies and Michael B. Jordan. But her mood darkened as she told me about a “special agreement” her employer made her sign promising that she would not get pregnant in her first two years on the job.

     

    Image

    Bella Wang told The Times about a “special agreement” her employer made her sign promising that she would not get pregnant in her first two years on the job.

    Bella Wang told The Times about a “special agreement” her employer made her sign promising that she would not get pregnant in her first two years on the job.

    Credit...

    Giulia Marchi for The New York Times

    When we spoke, Ms. Wang was counting down the days until her two years were up.

    “I’ve been wanting to have a baby all along,” she said. “But I haven’t dared.”

    We traveled to a town outside of Shanghai to meet Sharon Shao, who graduated with a computer engineering degree from one of China’s top universities. As is only befitting a math whiz, she picked us up at the train station in a white car with an “E = mc²” sticker plastered on the side. We found a private room in a teahouse where Ms. Shao, over several hours, alternated between anger and tears as she told us about her tumultuous relationship with her ex-husband. When she finally worked up the courage to divorce her husband, she said, she walked away with no claim to the apartment that she had helped pay for because, as is the case for millions of other Chinese women, her name was not on the deed.

    “My friends always tell me to just keep quiet and move on,” said Ms. Shao. “But I want to share my story so other women can learn from my mistakes.”

    By the end of our reporting, we had talked to dozens of women. I was stunned to find that nearly every woman we spoke with had a personal story to tell about egregious discrimination at the workplace or in the home.

    One woman told me about how she dreamed every night of going back to work after she was forced out of a prestigious job when she had a child. Another woman said she wanted to leave her husband but was afraid because her name was not on the deed.

    “If I divorce, I will lose everything,” she said.

    “The more I think about it,” she added, “the more difficult it feels to escape this dead end.”

    But as is increasingly the case in China these days, very few were willing to go on the record. This has become the reality of reporting in an increasingly authoritarian country whose — mostly male — leaders are so obsessed with controlling the narrative that even videos depicting extramarital affairs are subject to government censorship.

    I understood why many women didn’t want to take the risk. Since China’s leader, Xi Jinping, took power in 2012, we have seen the detention of feminist activists, a crackdown on the burgeoning #MeToo movement and the emergence of “female morality schools” in which women are made to scrub floors and are taught how to apologize to their husbands.

    Despite the overwhelming pressures, Chinese women are finding ways to push back.

    We saw a glimpse of their growing anger earlier this year on March 8, known as International Women’s Day. In recent years, what is supposed to be a celebration of the women’s rights movement has been co-opted by online retailers and transformed into a Black Friday-esque shopping holiday in China known as “Goddess Day.”

    That day, as women across China browsed online sales on cosmetics and sportswear, one female university student in Beijing walked up to two red Women’s Day banners that had been dedicated to the “little fairy” women, channeling the infantilizing tone so often used in advertising aimed at women in China.

    She lit the banners on fire.

    Photos of the blaze quickly spread on social media before internet censors took them down. We tried reaching out to the student but she declined to talk to us. Later, after she was reprimanded by school administrators, she posted a message on her social media account to clarify her actions.

    “Damn it, this day is not meant for consuming gender stereotypes,” she wrote.

    In a show of the simmering defiance that has quietly spread among women in China today, she concluded with the best non-apology apology that I have seen in a while: “There was indeed a lack of concern for safety when I set the fires so I apologize to my fellow students,” she wrote. “I should have used scissors.”

    Amy Qin is a China correspondent based in Beijing, covering the intersection of culture, politics and society. @amyyqin.

    in reply to: Session 10 - 11/16 (afternoon) #42451
    Angela Chong
    Spectator

    The discussion of etiquette in Japan, specfically related to business, was facinating to me. The importance of a business card is so different from what I've experienced. The other day someone gave me their card and I threw it in the conference bag I received when I entered the conference. Doing this in Japan would be perceived as thoughtless and rude. The idea that silence should not be avoided is a difficult one for me. I am a talker and I engage best when having a conversation. As an extrovert my energy comes from interaction and I realized several years ago I needed a job with significant human interaction, or else my soul would shrivel up and die. The idea of silience being part of the negotiation is actually quite profound to me. My husband is much less verbal than me and I remember the first time I met and had dinner with his parents no one spoke as we at the meal. I was quite uncomforable at first, until I realized after we had all finished eating we would be sitting and conversing at the table for a couple of hours. When Professor Peck mentioned not being afraid of silence this meal with my future in-laws came to mind. Thinking of it as a pressure relief makes me see it from another side though. Over the last few years, although I realized professionally I like human interaction, I've become more comfortable and even challenged myself not to feel the need to fill every moment with talking. The idea that silence gives a pressure relief and calms things is quite refreshing. It's interesting to me how those in Japan perceive us as Americans, being loud talkers. Having an understanding of Japanese culture helps me understand why that's the impression we make because it is so different. 

    in reply to: Session 10 - 11/16 (afternoon) #42450
    Angela Chong
    Spectator

    I found the discussion of the tea ceremony and how it fostered meditation because it was a mundane activity to be facinating. I enjoy vaccuming and the satisfaction that comes after it's completed. During the process of vaccuming my mind is very active and I sometimes come to some profound conclusions during that time because it's mundane. Several years ago I worked in a factory, which ended up only lasting for 2 and a half months, because my mind never stopped thinking. The mundane process of doing the same task over and over again for 8 hours was entirely too much for me. This is the point in the tea ceremony though. It kept the young monks who had not yet perfected their practice of meditation awake and somewhat engaged, allowing them to meditate more effectively. 

    in reply to: Session 10 - 11/16 (afternoon) #42449
    Angela Chong
    Spectator

    The lecture on architecture was rich and full of so many interesting and necessary practices that are unique to Japan. First the idea that no nails were used in Japanese buildings is facinating to me. I can remember a few times when I didn't have a stapler and I needed to keep some papers together. I did a series of folds to keep the papers from becoming separated from one another. To realize that entire buildings were built using a similar, obviously more sophisticated, type of construction is beyond something I knew exhisted. This type of contruction is a big piece of the pagoda, having a single trunk of a tree in the middle, coming out from it using the interlocking technique creates the structure of the building. We have type of pagoda in our front yard, this one made of stone, which is the opposite of the construction material most commonly used in Japan. Using wood made sense in light of the earthquakes which are common in the region. The timber form the forests meant they were utilizting the natural surrounding materials, which at a certain point they realized wouldn't be endless and had to make changes. The wood itself being a semi-permanent material meant they had to tear down and rebuild several times, in the case of historic buildings in Japan. It's shocking to realize there are no original historic structures in Japan. In earlier discussions of why Japan was so open to the changes of the modernization period and then later the influence of the United States, may be in part because they are used to change. The reality that even their buildings won't last forever and there is a confort in knowing that life must them move foward and change is necessary. This has continued, even with no wooden buildings. In Tokyo there are frequent demolishing of structures and a new one is constructed in it's place. It has resulted in me having a different understanding of Japan and the ability of the Japanese people to transform and be open to transformation and change. Even though there are obstacles and challenges facing the country, the changes needed to overcome them and move forward are another part of the rebuilding that is already part of the Japanese culture. 

    in reply to: Session 10 - 11/16 (afternoon) #42448
    Angela Chong
    Spectator

    The lecture on architecture was rich and full of so many interesting and necessary practices that are unique to Japan. First the idea that no nails were used in Japanese buildings is facinating to me. I can remember a few times when I didn't have a stapler and I needed to keep some papers together. I did a series of folds to keep the papers from becoming separated from one another. To realize that entire buildings were built using a similar, obviously more sophisticated, type of construction is beyond something I knew exhisted. This type of contruction is a big piece of the pagoda, having a single trunk of a tree in the middle, coming out from it using the interlocking technique creates the structure of the building. We have type of pagoda in our front yard, this one made of stone, which is the opposite of the construction material most commonly used in Japan. Using wood made sense in light of the earthquakes which are common in the region. The timber form the forests meant they were utilizting the natural surrounding materials, which at a certain point they realized wouldn't be endless and had to make changes. The wood itself being a semi-permanent material meant they had to tear down and rebuild several times, in the case of historic buildings in Japan. It's shocking to realize there are no original historic structures in Japan. In earlier discussions of why Japan was so open to the changes of the modernization period and then later the influence of the United States, may be in part because they are used to change. The reality that even their buildings won't last forever and there is a confort in knowing that life must them move foward and change is necessary. This has continued, even with no wooden buildings. In Tokyo there are frequent demolishing of structures and a new one is constructed in it's place. It has resulted in me having a different understanding of Japan and the ability of the Japanese people to transform and be open to transformation and change. Even though there are obstacles and challenges facing the country, the changes needed to overcome them and move forward are another part of the rebuilding that is already part of the Japanese culture. 

    in reply to: Session 10 - 11/16 (afternoon) #42447
    Angela Chong
    Spectator

    The lecture on architecture discussed 5 main types of Japanese architecture and the two that stood out most to me were the ornamental type and the zen. These are complete opposites of one another, and yet they are both Japanese. First, the description of this ornamental style as a baroque-like architecture feels extrememly accurate. I didn't think of this style as Japanese, and it made sense that these were borrowed from China, as I would have assumed that is where the structures pictured were located. What surprised me most, as the reading explained that this type of design only exhists now in Japan. Second, the zen, which before the reading and lecture this is what I thought of as Japanese architecture, but as Professor Bharme explained, all of these are Japanese. The clean lines were something I definitely noticed, but I did not realize there aren't diagonal lines until he pointed it out. Even down to the way the doors open, nothing creates a diagonal. There's something very open and nonconfrontational about the absence of diagonal lines and so many right angles. Nothing to draw your eye to a specific location or disturb your purpose for being in the room itself. At the risk of sounding obvious, it really does create a "zen" space. I can also see hte connection between this style and the architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright. I have been attracted to Wright's architectural style for a long time, and driving through neighborhoods those are the types of houses which stand out to me the most. Those types of structures look very solid, peaceful, relaxed, and I've always been very attracted to them. It's interesting that they take from the zen style in Japan, and I've always had that impression, not realizing why. 

     

    in reply to: Session 8 - 11/4, Jennifer Jung-Kim #42425
    Angela Chong
    Spectator

    What seems more important to him than anything, aside from his personal survival, is his watch. He talks about it multiple times, and when asked if he would like any other favor when being released back to his daily life by the Soviets, he asks about the watch!? He never knew what happened ot his son, and didn't ask about that? No mention of ensuring his younger wife and their children are ok, just the watch. He is definitely a chameleon and it is more about his survival than ensuring any of his family are ok. It makes me wonder, since this was part of such a popular book, if the appeal to Koreans is that he only takes care of himself? Also, that he in the end keeps going, he survives and in embarquing on the next chapter. Or maybe he's a kind of everyman character? Koreans will keep going, even if individuals do not surive, they as a people do? His focus on the physical characteristics of the other races were also likely part of the appeal. Things they couldn't necessarily say outloud, but were thinking over the years. 

    in reply to: Session 8 - 11/4, Jennifer Jung-Kim #42424
    Angela Chong
    Spectator

    As I was reading Kapitan Lee, the discussion by Dr. Yi of different races stood out to me. The doctor discusses his daughter in the United States, who is going ot marry a white man, and he comments about having a "white offspring." This is not a good thing in his eyes, and he gives his daughter a hard time about marrying someone who is white. He likens it to the pressure under Japanese occupation for Japanese and Koreans to marry, and in the beginning he cringed at it. Desipte his ability to adapt to different groups who were in power in Korea, underneath he is not in support of it. While the Korean people were not necessarily the Dominate culture, since he is Korean he views being pure as something of value. It's quite ironic actually, because he is the one who learns the language of whoever is in power, and changes himself to fit in each time. When the Soviets come and are in power, he refers to them as the big noses, and yet he does all he can to learn the language and assimilate quickly. It's only in his inner dialogue and some of what he discusses with his own family (his wife and daughter) that he reveals his distaste with the outsiders. In my Ethnic Studies classes we discuss the difference between race and ethnicity, and while Dr. Yi wants to hold onto his Korean genetic ancestry, he is more than willing to adjust his ethnicity to survive. 

    in reply to: Session 6 - 10/26 (morning), Saori Katada #42366
    Angela Chong
    Spectator

    I enjoyed reading your post and related to several of the things you mentioned. I got in on the Pokemon Go craze 3 summers ago when I was teaching summer schoo. We had masses of people out at the park near us on their phones and my neighbor, her son, and I even drove around to various places where we live to participate in the game. We have a raman place near our house and both of the owners spent time in the ramen/broth industry and studied in Japan before opening their own resturants here in the LA area. Last night my family and a friend and her son all went to Daiso Japan, a retail store and we spent an hour going down all the aisles. Many unique items, some useful, and others for decoration, including the sushi magnet and lucky cat magnet now on my fridge. 

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 45 total)