I found Dr. Vinayak Bharne's ten levels of influence on the construction of Asian cities a very helpful framework worth recapping. As I recall, the ten levels are: 1) Ancient sites on the virgin landscape; 2) Intra-Asian hybridities (e.g., the Taj Mahal, in India but influenced by Persian culture; 3) Colonialism (e.g., Portuguese influence in Macau); 4) Self-imposed Westernization; 5) Modern urbanism; 6) Illegal, informal habitats such as slums with significant economic activity; 7) Rural indigenous communities (such as the Fujian Hakka fortress-like villages); 8) Ambivalence to modern ubanism and cultural conservation efforts; 9) Instant megacities; 10) Post-industrial models of sustainability and new urbanism. I also appreciate the three overarching themes -- traditions, tensions, and transformations -- that he provides to help structure how we can start to sort through all this complexity.
Hello everyone; I'm lucky enough to get accepted to this class from the wait list, as a non K-12 teacher (although my brother David teaches history at Conestoga High in PA). I did teach Asian-American Studies at San Francisco State University from 2000-2005, and prior to that, I directed a (now discontinued) Masters program in Korean Studies at the Intercultural Institute of California. Currently, I volunteer as a Master Gardener (with University of California Cooperative Extension), and I have a 25-minute slide presentation called "Introduction to Korean Culture Through Plants." My favorite book on bridging East-West differences is is U. Michigan psychologist Richard Nisbitt's "The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently, and Why."