I was personally able to relate to the two reading you mentioned about Names. Although I was born and rased in the United States, I've gone through Kindergarten - 12 grade with nearly every teacher struggling to pronounce my name. Often times, I would have to americanize my name to sound like Hannah to make sure that teachers felt comfortable calling me as well as other students using this americanized verison of my name to prevent name calling. Similar to the characters in these stories, I've felt moments of embarrassment of having a name that was not easy to pronouce but at the same time, a loss of identity for having to take away from the culture and name I was given. I really appreciate your story about your grandmother because it really ties in the importance of a person's identity and their connection to their name. As an adult, I've learned to embrace my name as a part of my identity and culture. As educators, I find it highly valuable to accept students and their cultures simply by making an effort to prounce their names properly and as they would prefer to be recognized rather than replacing their identity with an easier "American" name.
It's actually the 38th Parallel but it is also considered the largest demarcation line in the world. It's interesting to note how much nature and wildlife is preserved in this boundary because no civilzation has taken place in these limitations since the Armstice in 1953. It was such a monumental moment to witness how such a reserved and protected boundary is slowly becoming less off-limits, especially since President Trump and President Moon Jae-in have recently been in talks and walked alongside each other. It makes me hopeful that one day, this boundary will no longer divide people between North and South Korea. Rather, I hope this space can be used to a much more meaningful purpose.
I think you bring a very important point to an area of concern that needs to be addressed. With a population as large as China, I wonder what the government can do to limit or even treat water pollution. I think it would be interesting to learn how the public in China feel towards the issue of water pollution and what they can do to address it. Similar to Japan's proactive mindset towards recycling, I'm curious as to whether there are proper ways to dispose of contaminated water and what kinds of irrigation systems can be used to treat and recycle the water.
I definitely admire your conscious effort to adapt your content to fit the minds of 7 and 8 year olds. As an elementary teacher myself, I wonder how to engage them in a way where the information we share makes sense and is interesting. Especially for students who've never been exposed to information about Asia, I personally enjoy being able to share information about my personal culture and history of Korea. I try to tie in similarities through things we can all enjoy such as food and games.
I was really surprised to learn about the large number of one person households in Japan. Especially since the current population continues to age, I wonder how Japan sustains the number of citizens in their country. It makes me wonder what the day to day life for an average one person is and how they get through holidays and celebrations without feeling lonely. I wonder if this trend will also continue to change in future years.
During my visit to Japan, I noticed the beauty of Japanese architecture of the buildings, temples, shrines, and parks. There was definite beauty in minimalism in which the design and structure of each edge, surface, and texture is intentional and simple. The simplicity of design and the repetition of patterns helped me to focus on each structure both as a whole and in specific parts. Shinto shrines were also very symmetrical had had specific details in each wood carving and curvature.
It amazes me how consistent and sturdy the materials such as wood and stone were made to last and held its uniformity. It was interesting to note how Chinese influence was included in some of the traditional design and paintings such as Nishi Honganji’s “Cloud Pavillion.”
The idea of Zen gardens always interested me about how sitting still is about “self discipline and mental dissociation with everything else.” The raked sand puzzles me but reminds me that stillness is important. I wonder if there is an alternate purpose to these raked designs and how they achieve such neatness when making them.
I found this article to be insightful in offering a personal perspective. I find the topic of reunification between the two Koreas to be such a relevant and current topic. Since the 1953 armstice, it has been over 60 years since any conversation has really occured. While some may be in favor of reunification, others are against the idea and consider North and South Korea vastly different from one another. I felt that this article offered a refreshing point of view in relevance to some of the current political tensions in China. While Hong Kong protests for its fight towards democracy, it's interesting to note how President Xinping pushes for reunification of China with Taiwan. I think we are undergoing a very important time period and climate of transition and push for change as integral parts of Asia pushes for political change.
This is the link to the article below: https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2018/05/16/610976485/2-generations-2-different-perspectives-on-korean-reunification
JEAN H. LEE
Jean H. Lee, the former Pyongyang bureau chief for The Associated Press, is the director of the Hyundai Motor-Korea Foundation Center for Korean History and Public Policy at the Wilson Center.
Fleeing war in North Korea in 1951, my aunt and her siblings scrambled aboard an American cargo ship pulling away from port, her parents and grandmother shouting their names to keep track of them in the chaos of the evacuation. They made it. But their grandfather stayed behind in Wonsan to protect the family property.
He thought his family would return. They never saw him, or the rest of their family in North Korea, again.
As the leaders of North Korea, South Korea and the United States discuss denuclearization and a possible peace treaty to formally end the Korean War of the 1950s, I wanted to check in with my aunt, a child of the war who was born in North Korea, and her millennial daughter Euni Cho, who grew up in democratic, thriving South Korea.
Foreign journalists have described the way South Koreans feel about the blossoming detente in dramatic terms: Euphoric. Giddy. Emotional.
We international observers want South Koreans to be giddy and euphoric because it fits a convenient narrative. South Korean President Moon Jae-in, too, wants his people to be overcome with emotion: The show of unity in the Demilitarized Zone between the Koreas was meant not only to establish ties between the two leaders, but also to grab the attention and emotions of the South Korean people — and to remind them of their connections to the North even after 70 years of division.
But I know, from speaking to my own family, how conflicted and complicated their feelings are toward North Korea, and how diverse their points of view are. Each generation bears a different history and, as a result, dreams of a different future.
Polls do show overwhelming support for President Moon's efforts. But have South Koreans so blindly embraced North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's recent overtures promising to renounce provocation in favor of peace? As an American journalist who covered the first inter-Korean summit in 2000, has lived and worked in Pyongyang, and has kept a close eye on the trail of broken promises on all sides over a quarter-century of negotiations with the North Koreans, I watched the Kim-Moon summit — and approach Kim's anticipated summit with President Trump — with a mix of optimism and skepticism. While I'm hopeful things will be different this time, we've been down this path before.
My aunt Younghwa Chun, a Viennese-trained pianist, watched the April 27 inter-Korean summit live on TV at home in a suburb of Seoul.
"I wasn't particularly moved," she says.
Like President Moon, my aunt's personal history traces back to the North. Her roots lie in Wonsan, the coastal city where Kim has a seaside villa. Later this month, the North Korean government will fly foreign journalists, including South Koreans, to Wonsan as part of a media junket designed to broadcast to the world the promised destruction of a northern nuclear test site.
My aunt was a toddler when her family fled, and doesn't have memories of life in North Korea. But she heard countless stories of life under communism and arduous journeys south — "if people fell off the boat, you could lose family members forever" — while growing up in Busan, the South Korean port city where the cargo ship landed and where many North Korean refugees scraped together new lives.
"When we were younger, we hated communism. They don't have the freedoms of democratic nations, and they maintain oppressive control," she says. "They execute people and kill them without trial."
For many in South Korea, live footage of their president holding hands with Kim and the two chatting privately — on the South Korean side of the DMZ — was altogether stunning. No North Korean leader before Kim Jong Un had ever set foot in South Korea since the 1953 Korean War cease-fire, and here he was, laughing with their president. The moment humanized Kim, and by extension all North Koreans, for many South Koreans — including my maternal uncle, Sung-jin Cho, who was sitting next to his wife at home watching the televised events unfold.
"I was a bit skeptical but my husband was very enthusiastic. He was intrigued by the summit," my aunt says. "But he's from Seoul, and I'm from a family from North Korea, so there's a difference in perspective."
At 70, my aunt is coolly rational about the sudden shift in the North Korean leader's image. She notes that he executed his uncle and may have ordered his brother's assassination in recent years. "I'm doubtful whether he could change just like that," she says.
She's watching to see how things go between Kim and President Trump at their historic summit in Singapore on June 12 before she puts any faith in Kim's word. North Korea, in an abrupt shift in tone, threatened Wednesday to pull out of those talks, raising questions about whether the meeting will go ahead as planned.
"Most of us are a bit skeptical. North Korea has done so many bad things. They've lied so much, which is why we can't trust them," she says. "I'm half doubtful. We'll see."
She has another concern: whether President Trump will agree to withdrawing the 28,500 U.S. troops protecting South Korea while negotiating a peace deal with the North to formally end the war in exchange for pledges on denuclearization.
"If we open our doors completely and the U.S. troops are evacuated, I'd be very anxious," she says. "I think the U.S. troops need to stay until South Korea can stand on its own."
She harbors hope for reunification of the divided Koreas, but cautions against moving too quickly.
"We're not foreigners; we're one nation. I hope we're able to find peace," my aunt says. But "even when we reconcile with a friend, we don't laugh together the next day. There's always some pent-up anger."
Meanwhile, my cousin Euni was busy getting ready for work on the morning of the Korean summit. In her early 30s, Euni owns a patisserie called Sweet Studio Dal D in the trendy hillside neighborhood of Gyeongnidan near the U.S. Army base.
Euni was 3 when Seoul hosted the Olympics in 1988, an event that served as a turning point in South Korea's transformation from poor, war-torn country to tiger nation determined to join the First World. She grew up in an increasingly globalized South Korea. Her struggles and goals as a young South Korean differ from her mother's as a refugee from the North.
"All I knew about North Korea was what I learned from my parents, calling them 'commies,' " Euni recalls.
She grew up in the affluent Gangnam section of Seoul. "Everyone around me was well off," she says, "and no one cared about the issues between North Korea and South Korea because we led comfortable lives."
As far as she and her friends were concerned, "North Korea was a scary presence, and no one supported reunification."
Growing up with threats from North Korea all her life, she had become inured to them. It was during a stint studying at a pastry school in Chicago a few years ago that she saw how North Korea's nuclear tests and missile launches looked from afar.
"When I told people I was from South Korea, they thought I came from a dangerous country," she says at her bakery. "We may be numb to it but it's true that we live on a peninsula with nuclear weapons. It must've looked dangerous from the outside."
Euni's preoccupation has been to build a small business in a competitive, high-pressure economy — not threats from North Korea.
"Even though people spoke of the possibility of war," she says, "it doesn't immensely affect our daily lives, and we don't worry about it every day."
Nonetheless, she decided to watch the summit on her iPhone while commuting to the bakery. Her immediate reaction was one of amusement: "It was more interesting than it was moving."
Two weeks later, she put the event into broader perspective, calling it unprecedented and impactful. "I'm hoping for good results," she says. "We came all the way here. I hope we don't go back in history."
But Euni draws the line at supporting reunification, saying she finds it hard to picture how they will bridge the economic gap when life is already so difficult in competitive South Korea, not to mention the cultural differences after 70 years of division.
"I don't really feel that we are one nation," Euni says. "The two nations have very different values." Reunification may have benefits — but could also be damaging to society and to the economy, she says.
As leaders negotiate the future of the Korean Peninsula, they must keep the divergent dreams of the different generations in mind. After all, it's young South Koreans like my cousin, working late into the night baking birthday cakes, who will pay for reconciliation and reunification — or, as I remind her, of provocation.
"For me, it's more about whether there will be war on the Korean Peninsula. So if that issue is resolved and we can maintain peace, it would be even better if we could interact," Euni says as she prepares to dive into the day's baking.
"But I'm thinking: 'Must we become one nation?'"
Freelance journalist Dasl Yoon contributed reporting from Seoul.
It wasa pleasure to hear Professor Jung Kim's lecture. As an undergraduate student, I had the privilege of taking her Korean 50 course and it was a good review of Korean history. Since then, a lot has changed in the current economy and politics with the corruption of Park Geun-Hye and the US-North Korea relations. There has also been a growth in economic strengths.
I enjoyed reading the literature pieces about Kapitan Lee and Cranes which reminded me of the book Pachinkio and how life in the past could have been.
Robinson's 20th century odyssey also shed light on the legacy of the Korean War and the divide between North and South Korea. It often makes me wonder what life would be like if the armstice did not occur postwar and the Koreas remained united. Especially since the political and economic advancement of South Korea, North Korea suffered drastically. As there have been changes in the past couple years and recent talks between North Korea and US as well South Korean leaders, I hope that reunification between the Koreas will be possible in our generation.
The lecture was very engaging and insightful. I found a deeper appreciation and understanding of the Godzilla movies and how it represented the grief of the Japanese people. Having been able to visit Japan, I was also amazed at the global influence of Japanese animation and the presence it holds through its apocalyptic imagination and contemporary Japanese pop culture.
The article about Japan's economy shed light on how it's economy continued to maintain preeminence yet was at war with itself. "Japanese companies in Southeast Asian countries also increased Japanese influence by creating loosely integrated networks, sometimes called "villages," that allowed them to communicate and cooperate closely with Tokyo. Japanese aid programs contributed to these networks, closely tying Tokyo's foreign policy to the interests of Japanese corporations." This integration of Japan's influence in neighboring countries allows Japan to influence both economically and diplomatically in these countries. However, "But Japan's foreign investments no longer bring with them the industrial dominance or political clout they once did. For one thing, there is now more competition: American and European firms have increased their presence in Asia, and Hong Kong and Taiwan have become major regional investors." The end of the article also points out that Japan could have much more potential if it allowed the role of highly educated women to take up more productive job positions as seen in China and Japan.
The Japanese economy was tied very closely to its relationship with the US, and how American patronage has been crucial to Japanese economic development. While there was some protest against the partnership wit the US, there was a faith in capitalist reconstruction to solve not only economic problems but also political ones, the belief that science and technology held the answer to social inequities in Japan.
I wonder how Japan's power would have continued to progress if it did not have as much of a beneficial partnership with the US. Although we discussed unions during lecture, the article points out that "social welfare provisions were added to the policy after labor unions teased out a new economic justification for reincorporating social welfare and redistribution of wealth into discussions of the economy.... All parties understood that this was not simply a debate between management and labor but intimately concerned government policy toward "sunset" industries. Labor's main accomplishment in that clash was to reintroduce debate on the relationship between economic justice and economic growth.32 Recognizing that declining industries were part of the industrial life cycle eventually led to the development of a "soft landing" policy for workers in those areas." It sounds as though there was a continuous struggle for unions to have their needs met through these policies.
The article regarding the Meiji Transformation was quite interesting to read. It was interesting to learn how Western foods were introduced to Japanese people and how they developed a much more varied diet than they had in the past. It's insightful how impact of the different types of foods they ate made most people stronger and healthier while increasing life expectancy and childbearing rates. I wonder what the comparison in statstics would be from befor and after the introduction of Western foods.
The Rise of Modern Japan article brought to light how benefial the World War was for Japan both economically and diplomatically. The lecture also shed light on how many corporations came about with the union of Western powers and influence. The concept of an Imperial Democracy was also quite interesting as the Japanese people strived for a more open government and society. I enjoyed learning that educated women promoted democracy through their organizations and deeds. Teachers, many of them Christian or influenced by missionaries, hoped to improve and reform society.
I found the role playing exercise in class to be very engaging and entertaining. It was interesting to listen to the different perspectives each group had to offer and how they interpreted their research on the characters they were representing. I personally found it very interesting to read and learn aboutt the revoluntionary, Qiu Jin and how she was a woman ahead of her time. Being an outspoken feminist, she placed herself outside of her comfort zone of what a typical traditional woman of her time would have been and was a matriarch.
Similarly, the exercise gave context to how the current residents of Hong Kong today are feeling in their protests and discontent with their government. As I read about the HIstory of the Chinese Revolution, the principles of the revolution seem to remain strong priinciples that people fight for today. Although the revolution occured after China's war with France in the 1880s, China continues to seek nationalism (indepdendence in spirit and conduct), democracy, and livelihood. I'm interested to learn more about Three Principles of the People and the Five Power Constitution and how people can devote themselves to the Republic.
I enjoyed reading the Concise History of Korea by Michael Seth. Korea had a lot of foreign influence from the West as well as Japan and China at this time. As Westerners considered, Korea the "hermit kingdom" in this time period, its interesting to learn that Koreans themselves were restricted to travel abroad whereas foreigners would visit Korea periodically. The discussions in class were also very interesting in how Korea was coveted as the "little brother."
Similar to other comments regarding the prosperity of Christianity in Korea, I wonder how Christianity it was able to thrive and grow so quickly. I think the March 1 movement was an important factor during the Japanese Occupation when Korean nationalism was high. While the growth of Christianity had a lot of positive benefits in Korea, what were some of the negative impacts of it in Korea?
It was also refreshing to hear about so much information regarding Comfort Women and advocacy groups who continue to make sure that the public is aware of the tragedies that occured to these women and current discussions between Japan and Korea regarding this issue. There are so many documentaries and films that paint a different picture and I'm excited to see some of the different ones that Professor Kim mentioned.
I found this article to be quite interesting and insightful with regard to the ongoing protests in Hong Kong. While the residents of Hong Kong demand their needs to be met, I wonder what tactics or changes in their protest strategies can be made to voice what changes need to take place. As mainland China remains somewhat dependent to Hong Kong's economy, what negotiations would be beneficial to all stakeholders? As less and less residents continue to protest, will there be enough momentum for Hong Kong to successfully oppose the extradition bill from being enacted?